DF-24-18010 Litigation Record Search

8. At 4:28 p.m. on June 11, 2026, Petitioner sent a proposed Final Decree of Divorce to Respondent and the Court for the Court’s signature. the proposed decree (June 12, 2026) and recusal “supplements” (June 15 and June 16, (No. 05-26-00854-CV) on June 12, 2026. On June 15, 2026, the Court of Appeals returned and rejected five of the ten documents Respondent submitted in connection with that filing. No court has stayed these proceedings. III. ARGUMENT AND AUTHORITIES A. Respondent’s pending motion to recuse is a tertiary recusal motion, and Texas Civil P...

B. The motion to recuse is also untimely. 14. Independently, Respondent’s motion to recuse is untimely. It was electronically submitted at 1:21 p.m. on June 11, 2026 — nine minutes before the 1:30 p.m. trial setting, and long after “the tenth day before the date set for trial.” TEX. R. CIV. P. 18a(b)(1). Nothing indicates Respondent neither knew nor reasonably should have known of any asserted ground before that date. C. No stay is in effect; the mandamus filing does not divest this Court of authority. 15. The filing of a petition for writ of mandamus do...

THE MARRIAGE OF GWENDOLYN ULIJASZ-MCKEMIE AND JASON MCKEMIE FINAL DECREE OF DIVORCE On June 11, 2026, the Court heard this cause. 1. Appearances Petitioner, GWENDOLYN ULIJASZ-McKEMIE ("Wife"), appeared in person and through her attorneys of record, Jonathan D. Steele and Rebecca Lee Armstrong, announced ready for trial, and proved up her case on Petitioner's pleading and supersedes all prior petitions, including the December 2024 original pleading. Respondent, JASON EMORY McKEMIE (“Husband”), previously appeared and answered pro se. The Court finds this...

This Supplement does not reurge the same grounds asserted in the prior recusals. Each recusal arose from a distinct escalation point in an increasingly severe pattern of procedural breakdown, discovery obstruction, financial concealment, healthcare interference, and trial-preparation sabotage: e Recusal No. 1 addressed the 254th District Court's failure to hear emergency relief, discovery obstruction, medical collapse, and the procedural trap created when counsel withdrew during discovery and reappeared at the discovery deadline to file blanket objection...

4.Prohibit Petitioner, her counsel, experts, vendors, investigators, agents, contractors, or anyone acting with or for her from accessing, inspecting, imaging, copying, using, relying on, benefiting from, or receiving any derivative benefit from Jason's stolen hard drives, evidence repositories, trial binders, Apple devices, computers, records, tools, briefcase, passport, medications, or seized litigation materials. 5. Require third-party source verification before any decree is signed or enforced, including healthcare/HSA/FSA/OLE/COBRA records, Accentur...

ll. THE FIRST RECORDED EVENT IN THIS CASE MATTERS On January 7, 2025, at the protective-order hearing, Donna Tomlinson of Hargrave Family Law appeared and moved to withdraw from representing Petitioner. Judge Sandra Jackson expressed concern because serious allegations had been made, the matter involved a protective order, and a continuance had already been granted. Donna Tomlinson then stated on the record that proceeding forward with her representation of Gwendolyn Ulijasz-McKemie would violate her ethical oath as an officer of the court. That was not...

evidence theft, hard-drive theft, trial-material theft, false reporting, source-record concealment, and refusal to restore the conditions necessary for trial. Respondent is the party fighting to survive and obtain a fair trial; he is not the source of the obstruction. Respondent files this Motion despite the known risk because the new evidence and current posture do not merely warrant recusal - they demand it. There is no possibility of fair trial when the opposing party violated mutual injunctions, unlawfully entered the residence, stole the hard drives...

A reasonable person could question impartiality where the case is forced to final trial despite known structural impossibility, stolen evidence repositories, stolen hard drives, stolen trial materials, unavailable source financial records, unresolved healthcare/OLE records, unresolved de novo/trial- readiness issues, rejected or unresolved adequate-trial-time requests, and Respondent's present inability to safely appear or present evidence. NEW MATERIAL FACTS SINCE THE PRIOR RECUSAL PROCEEDINGS Since the prior recusal proceedings, Petitioner unlawfully e...

Petitioner siphoned approximately $650,000 from marital accounts, declared destitution, and eft Respondent carrying approximately $25,000 per month in marital-estate obligations while Petitioner earned approximately $125,000 per month and Respondent had no income, no counsel, no access to survival funds, and was recovering from spinal surgery. Petitioner then committed perjury through false sworn statements suggesting financial helplessness, while concealing substantial resources and spending heavily on counsel, vendors, investigators, and third-party li...

Respondent was involved in a car wreck last week. Respondent's vehicle is unsafe for extended travel. Respondent is also currently living in his vehicle, without stable housing, without working phone service, and without the ability to call for emergency help if his condition worsens during travel. Respondent has diverted from attempting to travel to Dallas and is presently in or near Bryan, Texas, where Respondent is being taken for emergency medical evaluation and/or hospital treatment for congestive-heart-failure symptoms. Respondent cannot safely dri...

Respondent requests immediate remote-access information by email so Respondent may make every possible effort to appear remotely by Zoom, Webex, Teams, telephone alternative, email link, or any available Wi-Fi method from the hospital, emergency-care setting, or available internet connection. Respondent's phone service is disconnected. Respondent requests that all remote-access information be sent by email to jmckemie@mckemie.net. IV. TRIAL SHOULD NOT PROCEED IN RESPONDENT'S ABSENCE Respondent objects to any trial proceeding, evidence presentation, witne...

Respondent has repeatedly informed this Court that Petitioner obstructed Respondent's healthcare access, including medical coverage, HSA access, FSA access, medication access, surgery access, and related benefits. Petitioner obstructed Respondent's healthcare access beginning no later than December 18, 2024. Petitioner caused or participated in a false divorce-based OLE that cut off Respondent's healthcare on October31, 2025, despite no divorce decree existing on that date. Petitioner has repeatedly represented compliance while Respondent contests functi...

2. Fraudulent protective-order applications, false protective-order evidence, and abuse of protective-order process; 3. Fraudulent evidence submissions, fabricated evidence, altered evidence, false exhibits, and use or attempted use of stolen evidence; 4. Perjury, aggravated perjury, coordinated aggravated perjury, false sworn testimony, false declarations, and false representations to the Court; 5. Malicious prosecution, malicious use of process, and malicious continuation of proceedings, where legally available; 6. Abuse of process, itigation abuse, pr...

15. Financial sabotage, financial strangulation, concealment or dissipation of marital assets, source-record concealment, account wipeouts, disguised transfers, false characterization of equity/investment compensation, and obstruction of estate reconstruction; 16. Manufactured eviction, concealed lease buyout, landlord/lease-buyout concealment, county court, bankruptcy, or civil remedies; 17.Attorneymisconduct,counselparticipation,former-counselparticipation,current-counsel participation, pro hac vice counsel conduct, law-firm conduct, discovery obstruct...

NO WAIVER OF STOLEN-EVIDENCE CLAIMS Respondent does not waive any claim, objection, sanction request, contempt request, exclusion request, preservation request, or civil claim arising from Petitioner's theft of Respondent's hard drives, evidence repositories, binders, paper files, legal work product, printer, printer ink, trial materials, medications, device evidence, Apple evidence, financial records, medical records, and itigation equipment. This was theft. No softer label applies. Petitioner unlawfully entered a residence she was barred from entering,...

4. Do not treat Respondent's medical collapse, lack of transportation, no phone service, homelessness, no gas money, unsafe vehicle, lack of parking funds, broken laptop screen, hospitalization, inability to physically appear, or need to seek emergency medical care as waiver, abandonment, failure to prosecute, consent to trial, or consent to final orders. 5. Order that all proceedings occur on the record with a court reporter and that no off-record trial-readiness, de novo, recusal, healthcare, financial, or evidence-theft matters be resolved without a v...

THIS 1S A AMANUFACTURED COLLAPSE, NOT LATE NOTICE Petitioner and her counsel will say this is late. That is false. Respondent has warned the Court for seventeen months that Petitioner was using false reports, protective-order narratives, healthcare obstruction, financial strangulation, discovery obstruction, housing sabotage, digital access, third- party vendors, and court process to destroy his ability to survive and defend himself. The record already includes repeated requests for emergency financial relief, healthcare enforcement, HSA/FSA access, cour...

and Jason Parro. Those matters are relevant because this case follows the same pattern: false narratives, police involvement, protective-order weaponization, financial strangulation, reputational destruction, healthcare interference, and itigation used as a method of control and destruction. Respondent told law enforcement that he feared for his safety and future because he had discovered extensive documentation showing a long pattern of malicious litigation and that Petitioner was going to file false police reports and a false protective order against h...

4. Do not treat Respondent’s medical collapse, lack of transportation, no phone service, homelessness, no gas money, unsafe vehicle, lack of parking funds, broken laptop screen, hospitalization, inability to physically appear, or need to seek emergency medical care as waiver, abandonment, failure to prosecute, consent to trial, or consent to final orders. 5. Order that all proceedings occur on the record with a court reporter and that no off-record trial-readiness, de novo, recusal, healthcare, financial, or evidence-theft matters be resolved without a v...

THIS IS A MANUFACTURED COLLAPSE, NOT LATE NOTICE Petitioner and her counsel will say this is late. That is false. Respondent has warned the Court for seventeen months that Petitioner was using false reports, protective-order narratives, healthcare obstruction, financial strangulation, discovery obstruction, housing sabotage, digital access, third- party vendors, and court process to destroy his ability to survive and defend himself. The record already includes repeated requests for emergency financial relief, healthcare enforcement, HSA/FSA access, court...

and Jason Parro. Those matters are relevant because this case follows the same pattern: false narratives, police involvement, protective-order weaponization, financial strangulation, reputational destruction, healthcare interference, and litigation used as a method of control and destruction. Respondent told law enforcement that he feared for his safety and future because he had discovered extensive documentation showing a long pattern of malicious litigation and that Petitioner was going to file false police reports and a false protective order against...

evidence-theft, protective-order, and sanctions issues. Il. SPECIFIC ISSUES PRESENTED FOR DE NOVO REVIEW Under Texas Family Code § 201.015(b), Jason specifically requests de novo review of the following issues: 1. The denial of Respondent, Jason McKemie's, Motion for Enforcement, Sanctions, Continuance, and Leave to Issue Third-Party Subpoenas. 2. The refusal or failure to consider Jason's continuance / abatement request despite the June 11, 2026, trial setting and the unresolved source-record, discovery, healthcare, stolen-evidence, and trial-readiness...

lacking traceable funding, account entry, repayment history, and community-purpose proof. 9. The denial or failure to address sanctions, show-cause relief, adverse inferences, fee shifting against Petitioner and responsible counsel, counsel certification, forensic accounting from third-party financial source records, estate reconstitution under Texas Family Code § 7.009, and disproportionate division under Texas Family Code § 7.001. 10.The denial or failure to enforce healthcare, HSA/FSA, prescription, reimbursement, benefits-card, benefits-portal, QLE,...

Petitioner be denied in full, with no later prove-up, no reserved entitlement, and no cost shifting against Jason. 18.The denial or failure to address witness-protection issues involving Christopher McNally and Jonathan Drake Steele. 19.The denial or failure to address trial-readiness defects created by incomplete financial production, blocked source-record subpoenas, missing/stolen evidence repositories, unresolved healthcare access, lack of functional litigation infrastructure, and unresolved witness-protection issues. 20.Any finding, conclusion, recom...

EXHIBIT INDEX AND CLICKABLE REFERENCE MAP 0 https://tinyurl.com/POExhibitIndex Index of Exhibit's with clickable links to supporting documentation. Document includes descriptions of referencd materials for context. DANE PATCHING DECLARATION https://tinyurl.com/DestructionDeclaration A Independent witness evidence regarding April 16 aftermath, destructive handling, electronics and valuables near trash, camera/security damage, and Applicant not being the dangerous actor. APRIL 16 WRIT AFTERMATH / TIMELINE / PHOTOS / VIDEOS https://tinyurl.com/WritAftermath...

PROTECTIVE ORDER EXHIBIT MAP Each exhibit uses a 3-row block: ID | NAME | LINK 1 / LINK 2 | DESCRIPTION. Add new exhibits by copying any complete 3-row block. LEASE BUYOUT / MANUFACTURED EVICTION EVIDENCE K https://tinyurl.com/LeaseFraud Supports manufactured eviction/access pressure, housing instability, predicted cleanout, and third-party access setup. DESTROYED AT&T MODEM / SECURITY-SYSTEM DISABLEMENT L https://tinyurl.com/DestroyedModem Shows destruction/disablement of internet, security, alarm, and camera infrastructure during or after April 16. SIG...

NO.__________________________________________ APPLICANT § GWENDOLYN LAURA ULIJASZ § TEXAS PHOTO EXHIBIT W | WRIT AFTERMATH I. PRIOR COURT HISTORY AND NOTICE REGARDING PETITIONER’S ACCESS TO THE RESIDENCE Petitioner repeatedly requested access to the marital residence through pleadings and during court hearings. On January 6, 2026, during a motion-to-compel hearing, Judge Abendroth initially approved access over Applicant’s objections. After reviewing the history, however, the Court stated that Petitioner had already been given more than enough time to re...

witness was called, before any exhibit was offered, before any testimony was taken, and before any trial evidence was received. Jason also requested that the recusal be addressed before evidence and objected to any witness being called, exhibit being offered, testimony being taken, or trial evidence being received before the motion was decided or referred. The e-service record reflects that the Motion to Recuse and Request for Referral was served on June 11, 2026 at 1:21:45 p.m. III. RULE 18a STATUS NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED BEFORE DECREE ACTION Texas Rule o...

This notice is made to preserve the record, prevent waiver, and avoid any false record that Jason acquiesced in decree action while the pending verified recusal remained unresolved or unclear. VII. REQUESTED RELIEF Jason respectfully requests that the Court: denied, granted, or referred; 2. direct the Clerk to deliver the pending verified recusal, this notice, the emergency supplement, and the supplemental exhibit map to the respondent judge and regional presiding judge; 3. withhold rendition, signature, entry, transmission, enforcement, or approval of a...

Jason objects to any rendition, signature, entry, transmission, enforcement, implementation, property transfer, debt allocation, healthcare/benefits effect, injunction, fee award, cost award, sanction, or final-decree effect before: 1. the pending verified recusal is decided; 2. the pending verified recusal is referred; 3. the Court states a written or on-record good-cause basis for proceeding despite the pending verified recusal; or 4. the Court identifies the legal basis for proceeding despite the pending verified recusal and Jason’s pending objections...