DF-24-18010 Litigation Record Search

7/16/2025 6:06 AM DALLAS CO., TEXAS NOTICE: THIS DOCUME NTC DF-24-18010 NO. THE MARRIAGE OF § § & § MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PERJURY AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT AGAINST GWENDOLYN ULUJASZ-MCKEMIE PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND REFERRAL On this day, the Court considered Petitioner JJason McKemie's Motion for Sanctions and Aggravated Perjury and Fraud Upon the Court Against Gwendolyn Ulijasz- McKemie. After reviewing the Motion, evidence submitted, and applicable law, the Court hereby finds as follows: 1. That Respondent Gwendolyn Ulijasz-McK...

...l, medical hardship, and denial of procedural rights that flowed directly from the false testimony already documented and submitted as Exhibit A. SIGNED this day of June 2025. JUDGE PRESIDING 2 of 11 Copy from re:SearchTX

Respectfully Submitted, Jason McKemie Petitioner, Pro Se 539 W Commerce St #2010 Dallas, TX 75208 (214) 868-4901 jmckemie@mckemie.net 3 of 11 Copy from re:SearchTX

on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing Envelope ID: 103183076 Filing Code Description: Motion - Sanctions Filing Description: Status as of 7/17/2025 8:35 AM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Kim Jones kjones@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Jeffrey ECook jcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Tiffany Castenada tcastenada@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT William CCook wcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Ethan Scroggins escroggins@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025...

7/16/2025 6:06 AM DALLAS CO., TEXAS NOTICE: THIS DOCUME NTC DF-24-18010 NO. THE MARRIAGE OF § § & § MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FOR PERJURY AND FRAUD UPON THE COURT AGAINST GWENDOLYN ULUJASZ-MCKEMIE PROPOSED ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS AND REFERRAL On this day, the Court considered Petitioner JJason McKemie's Motion for Sanctions and Aggravated Perjury and Fraud Upon the Court Against Gwendolyn Ulijasz- McKemie. After reviewing the Motion, evidence submitted, and applicable law, the Court hereby finds as follows: 1. That Respondent Gwendolyn Ulijasz-McK...

...l, medical hardship, and denial of procedural rights that flowed directly from the false testimony already documented and submitted as Exhibit A. SIGNED this day of June 2025. JUDGE PRESIDING 2 of 11 Copy from re:SearchTX

Respectfully Submitted, Jason McKemie Petitioner, Pro Se 539 W Commerce St #2010 Dallas, TX 75208 (214) 868-4901 jmckemie@mckemie.net 3 of 11 Copy from re:SearchTX

on the date and to the persons listed below. The rules governing Envelope ID: 103183076 Filing Code Description: Motion - Sanctions Filing Description: Status as of 7/17/2025 8:35 AM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Kim Jones kjones@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Jeffrey ECook jcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Tiffany Castenada tcastenada@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT William CCook wcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:06:55 AM SENT Ethan Scroggins escroggins@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025...

7/16/2025 6:03 AM DALLAS CO., TEXAS DF-24-18010 NO. THE MARRIAGE OF & EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND CONTINUE TRIAL DUE TO PROCEDURAL SABOTAGE AND BREAKDOWN IN JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF THE 254TH DISTRICT COURT: Petitioner, Jason McKemie, appearing pro se, respectfully submits this EMERGENCY MOTION TO PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND CONTINUE TRIAL DUE TO PROCEDURAL SABOTAGE AND BREAKDOWN IN JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT. Petitioner declares, he is not ready for trial. The legal process which has led to this point has been strategically manipulat...

Discovery was evaded. Legal counsel was strategically severed. Financial access was stripped. Sworn evidence-including video-documented perjury, asset concealment, and coordinated fraud-remains unacknowledged, unruled upon, and unaddressed. And now, the same legal team who disappeared for weeks during discovery-only to reappear minutes before the deadline and file blanket objections to every request- claims they are "ready for trial." Ready for what? A performance? A sentencing without trial? Petitioner is not ready for trial because this is not a trial....

of its kind. Respondent has a documented history of leveraging false accusations and legal systems for personal advantage. The strategy was systematic and unmistakable: ¢ Cut off Petitioner's legal funding e Manufacture allegations of stalking and abuse e Isolate Petitioner from marital assets, healthcare access, and representation e Introduce fabricated testimony under oath by a financially interested family member e Initiate false criminal proceedings to justify a protective order and silence Petitioner going forward-a pattern for which Respondent has...

was Suicidal, armed, and dangerous. She has sent police and emergency personnel to Petitioner's residence under fabricated pretexts and claimed he was tracking her with AirTags. Those devices were turned over to the San Antonio Police Department. Subpoenas issued to Apple confirmed that Petitioner never had access to or control over any of the AirTags-exactly as he stated. The result of no fewer than six separate law enforcement investigations into Respondent's allegations? She was referred to their mental health group for monitoring by the San Antonio P...

of this case is undisputed. These loans are structured on 30-year terms at 2% interest, with no enforceability, no documentation resembling commercial standards, no realistic expectation of repayment, and no bank statements to substantiate funds transfers. Simultaneously, Respondent is investing over $130,000 annually into a VEIP equity fund yielding a 50% vested return within a single calendar year-a vehicle from which both she and her sister directly benefit. These "loans" are then dumped on the community estate as artificial liabilities, designed to d...

final day of discovery, the same legal team reappeared-armed with a stack of pre- These filings were prepared while the attorneys were allegedly withdrawn, and at no point did they cease operating in Respondent's interest. The entire withdrawal was a procedural mirage-a tactic to prevent discovery and disable opposition. They never actually left. The court witnessed this. It was raised in filings. It was detailed in motions. And yet, no action was taken. Due process was obstructed. The rule of law was openly violated without a single footnote acknowledgi...

ACCORDINGLY, PETITIONER RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT THE COURT: 1. IMMEDIATELY CONTINUE THE BENCH TRIAL To prevent further procedural and constitutional harm resulting from discovery obstruction, strategic denial of counsel, and active deprivation of due process. 2. IMMEDIATELY APPROVE EMERGENCY FINANCIAL RELIEF Approve Petitioner's emergency request for $20,000 in immediate housing and Eviction During Medical Hardship. Petitioner will be rendered homeless if this request is not ruled upon this week. 3. PRESERVE THE FOLLOWING MATERIALS AND RECORDS To ensur...

...eferenced by either party; ¢ All affidavits and sworn statements submitted by Petitioner under penalty of perjury; e The full transcript (if available) of the January 7, 2025 hearing; ¢ All filings, correspondence, and declarations from Respondent regarding: o Spousal support o Legal fees o Settlement concealment o Personal loans between Respondent and affiliated parties e Any involvement or correspondence by risk mitigation firms, private security teams, or off-duty police officers contracted by Respondent in connection with this litigation. Petitioner...

PETITIONER'S REQUEST Petitioner respectfully requests that this Court issue a Statement of Fact regarding the contradictory sworn testimony and the video evidence submitted as Exhibit A. The contradiction is not nuanced-it is direct, visible, and undeniable. Should the Court decline to acknowledge the evidence or rule upon it, Petitioner reserves the right to seek judicial review, oversight, or formal complaint through all appropriate administrative and appellate channels. The procedural integrity of this Court and the dignity of its rulings depend on it...

...ner reserves the right to raise this omission in all appellate and judicial oversight forums as a failure to acknowledge material fraud upon the Court. At the January 7, 2025, hearing, Pamela Woodman Respondent's sister and a financially interested party in this litigation-testified under oath that a "former police officer" discovered a hidden surveillance device in a plant at the marital residence. Her exact words were: "There were some visible cameras in every room of the house. Some were hidden, some were in plants. There were listening devices throug...

present in the video, and her voice is clearly heard instructing Respondent to stop speaking to Petitioner through the security camera system. Both women knew what the device was. Respondent mocked Petitioner for buying it. They acknowledged it. And then they coordinated a perjured exchange in open court to suggest the device was part of a criminal surveillance setup. This was not misinterpretation. It was intentional fabrication. Woodman's motive was clear: she had provided Respondent with over $60,000 in below-market personal loans while Respondent div...

...ion - Miscellaneous Filing Description: EMERGENCY M/PRESERVE EVIDENCE AND CONTINUE TRIAL DUE TO PROCEDURAL SABOTAGE AND BREAKDOWN IN JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT Status as of 7/17/2025 8:29 AM CST Case Contacts Name BarNumber Email TimestampSubmitted Status Kim Jones kjones@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:03:48 AM SENT Jeffrey ECook jcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:03:48 AM SENT Tiffany Castenada tcastenada@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:03:48 AM SENT William CCook wcook@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025 6:03:48 AM SENT Ethan Scroggins escroggins@sullivancook.com 7/16/2025...